Becoming better leaders… without becoming superheroes
The competing theories on how to develop leadership qualities can be neatly divided into two camps. First of all, we have the “development looking out” approach which involves identifying positive role-models to follow.On the other hand, we have the “development looking in” school which advocates harnessing our emotions to achieve our full potential. Obviously, there is also a middle way which combines both approaches. This is probably the most fruitful course of action.
When management studies began to focus on leadership, the “development looking out” model was the order of the day. Writers analyzed great leaders from history or in business, such as Jack Welch, Napoleon or Churchill. They looked at how these figures acted to try to extract patterns of behaviour to hold up as a model. This approach is interesting. It gives us clues as to how we can improve, and it also provides a wealth of famous quotes to try out on friends and clients. However, when we read biographies of famous people or heroes, we are often drawn into thinking how short we fall of their standards. And this is indeed the case. It’s as if being a leader meant becoming a combination of John Wayne and Albert Einstein, as the authors of Karaoke Capitalism, Jonas Ridderstrale and Kjell Nordström, say.
The essence of being a leader is much simpler than that, although no easier. The necessary, but not sufficient, condition of being a leader is to have followers. Whereas managers are in charge of teams who follow their orders, leaders have people who want to follow them. This fundamental difference has many implications. First, we all have been, or may in the future be, leaders in a particular situation. This may come as something of a relief. Secondly, leadership is a question of emotions. For this reason, any effort directed at developing our potential as leaders has to be based on “looking in”.
We all know that we have to delegate. We don’t need a consultant or a book to tell us that. What we have to find out, and afterwards deal with, is what makes it difficult for us to delegate in the people we manage or to spend more time with them. At root, the answer is always a silent but important emotion: fear. As a corollary, the development of leadership skills is bound up with dealing with our fear, since it is fear which stops us using all of our potential and making the most of our talents. I don’t think that we can become better leaders without becoming better people; and that takes a lot of courage. Looking in is not always a pleasant task, and I know too many people who find thousands of excuses not to do it.
